The recent Australian Federal Court decision of McD Asia Pacific LLC v Hungry Jack’s Pty Ltd [2023] FCA 1412 confirms on one aspect that, for the purposes of registered trade mark infringement in Australia, the reputation of each trade mark is not to be considered when determining whether the trade marks are deceptively similar. The […]
Trade Marks Update
Whilst there were many aspects to this litigation, in the recent Federal Court of Australia decision of Cantarella Bros Pty Ltd v Lavazza Australia Pty Ltd[1], it was held that Lavazza Australia Pty Ltd (Lavazza) was successful in establishing that Cantarella Bros Pty Ltd (Cantarella) was not the owner in Australia of “ORO” registered trade […]
Market-Size Damages & Australian Preliminary Injunctions
Summary Having regard to the recent decision of Commonwealth of Australia v Sanofi (formerly Sanofi-Aventis) 2023 FCAFC 97, pharmaceutical originator patentees seeking to prevent the entry of a generic drug into the Australian market through a preliminary injunction, need to be aware that the Australian Government has a right to seek “market-size damages” from the […]
Australia: Patent Box – Expansion to Agricultural and Low Emissions Innovations
In its Budget 2022-23, the Australian Government announced major expansions to the proposed ‘Patent Box’ scheme providing concessional tax treatment to eligible income for Australian corporate taxpayers. The Government will now expand the scheme to support innovations in the Australian agricultural sector, specifically: In addition, the Government will provide concessional tax treatment for corporate taxpayers […]
Australian Design Law Update
In a major development for Australia commencing on 10th March 2022, publications or use of a design on or after 10th March 2022, will be protected by a 12-month grace period. This development will bring Australia into line with jurisdictions such as the United States of America and Europe and protects product designers against certain inadvertent […]
Methods of Medical Diagnosis are Patentable Inventions in Australia
Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc v Sequenom, Inc [2021] FCAFC 101[1] A recent Full Federal Court of Australia decision held that methods of medical diagnosis are clearly patentable subject matter in Australia. We previously reported the first instance decision of the Federal Court of Australia,[2] which on this issue, has been approved by the Full Federal Court […]